The integration of interactions in polygenic risk scores (PRSs)
Canonne, Hugo
Promotor(s) :
Van Steen, Kristel
Date of defense : 30-Jun-2025/1-Jul-2025 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/23259
Details
| Title : | The integration of interactions in polygenic risk scores (PRSs) |
| Translated title : | [fr] Intégration des interactions dans les scores de risque polygéniques (PRS) |
| Author : | Canonne, Hugo
|
| Date of defense : | 30-Jun-2025/1-Jul-2025 |
| Advisor(s) : | Van Steen, Kristel
|
| Committee's member(s) : | Phillips, Christophe
Vandewalle, Gilles
|
| Language : | English |
| Number of pages : | 76 |
| Keywords : | [en] Polygenic risk score, [en] Epistasis, [en] Gene-environment interactions, [en] Risk stratification, [en] Clinical utility, [en] Genome-wide association studies, [en] Machine learning, [en] Deep learning, [en] Personalized medicine |
| Discipline(s) : | Engineering, computing & technology > Multidisciplinary, general & others |
| Target public : | Researchers Professionals of domain Student General public Other |
| Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
| Degree: | Master en ingénieur civil biomédical, à finalité spécialisée |
| Faculty: | Master thesis of the Faculté des Sciences appliquées |
Abstract
[en] Context: A polygenic risk score (PRS) aggregates the effects of many genetic variants (usually SNPs) across the genome. Each variant contributes a small amount to the risk or likelihood of a trait and effects are typically derived from GWAS. However, most classic PRSs are based on additive models and do not explicitly account for gene-gene (GxG) or gene-environment (GxE) interactions, which can influence this risk. These interactions could improve PRS prediction performance, population transferability, and clinical value.
Objectives: The purpose of this scoping review was to map the current state of the art in integrating GxG and GxE interactions into PRSs. It focusses on the research issues addressed, the methodologies used, and the impact of these interactions on PRS transferability and clinical utility.
Methods: This work followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in the Pubmed bibliographic database using keywords related to PRSs and GxG/GxE interactions. After selection by title, abstract and then full text according to predefined criteria, 15 articles were included in the review.
Results: The 15 papers chosen were grouped into two categories: methodological approaches (creation of new integration methods) and applied approaches. The analytical approaches used include both standard statistical models and machine learning and deep learning methods for capturing complex interactions. Standard PRS calculation tools (e.g., PLINK) and machine learning libraries (e.g., scikit-learn) were used for advanced modelling. Overall, the incorporation of GxG and GxE interactions led to moderate predictive increases in certain situations and enhanced PRS transferability between groups, but the advantages remain variable.
Conclusion: Integrating G×G and G×E interactions into PRSs reveals non-additive effects overlooked by standard models, potentially improving prediction performance and transferability. However, methodological heterogeneity, limited statistical power, and the variety of biological environments restrict these advantages. Future opportunities include developing harmonised analytical frameworks and establishing large multi-ethnic cohorts with rich environmental data. Additionally, undertaking targeted systematic reviews will fully validate and quantify the clinical efficacy of interaction-enhanced PRSs.
File(s)
Document(s)
Annexe(s)
Cite this master thesis
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.

Master Thesis Online


TFE_Hugo_Canonne.pdf