Feedback

HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
Mémoire
VIEW 85 | DOWNLOAD 1

Defining the best fundamental indexing strategy from 1998 to 2015.

Télécharger
Colmonts, Maxime ULiège
Promoteur(s) : Lambert, Marie ULiège
Date de soutenance : 6-sep-2016/12-sep-2016 • URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/1860
Détails
Titre : Defining the best fundamental indexing strategy from 1998 to 2015.
Titre traduit : [fr] Definir la meilleur stratégie d'indexation fondamentale de 1998 à 2015
Auteur : Colmonts, Maxime ULiège
Date de soutenance  : 6-sep-2016/12-sep-2016
Promoteur(s) : Lambert, Marie ULiège
Membre(s) du jury : Fays, Boris ULiège
Cogneau, Philippe ULiège
Langue : Anglais
Nombre de pages : 106
Mots-clés : [en] smart beta
[en] fundamental indexing
[en] profit metrics
[en] dividend metrics
[en] outperformance
Discipline(s) : Sciences économiques & de gestion > Finance
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Diplôme : Master en sciences de gestion, à finalité spécialisée en Banking and Asset Management
Faculté : Mémoires de la HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège

Résumé

[en] In this paper, we try to establish the best -smart beta- fundamental metric among the dividend metric and the profit metric. Regarding the dividend metrics, we built a pure dividend, a dividend yield and net payout indexes. For profit metrics, we decided to focus on the gross profitability, the operating profitability and the cash operating return on assets metrics. The covered period runs from the 1st of January 1998 to the 1st of January 2015 and covers two expansion and two recession cycles. We used the Nasqad composite of March 2016 as a basket of stocks in order to construct our indexes. In our quest to find the best metric among those we chose, we decided to apply different weighting and sorting methodology to our indexes. The weighting strategy we tested are respectively the fundamentally weighted method and the equally weighted method. Regarding the sorting of data, we decided to apply to them the last data available method and trailing five-year average method. The latter is assumed to smooth the data in order to reduce the high cyclical performance (Arnott, Hsu and Moore, 2005). At the end of the day, we ended up with four different indexes for each studied metric.
Then, we have computed some of the most important performance ratios for each index that we built and we plotted their cumulative monthly returns. These results helped us to compare the indexes regarding their risk-adjusted returns and to establish the indexes with the best potential.
Afterwards, we regressed each of our indexes on the Fama & French 4-factor to which we also added the VIX. At the end of the day, we analyze whether our indexes were tilted towards market, size, value, winner and implied volatility factor.
Ultimately, we conclude that the trailing five-year average operating profitability index, that is equally weighted, outperforms the other dividend metrics as well as the other profit metrics.


Fichier(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Définitif_mémoire_pdf.pdf
Description:
Taille: 2.25 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Auteur

  • Colmonts, Maxime ULiège Université de Liège > Master sc. gest., fin. spéc. banking & asset (ex 2e master)

Promoteur(s)

Membre(s) du jury

  • Nombre total de vues 85
  • Nombre total de téléchargements 1










Tous les documents disponibles sur MatheO sont protégés par le droit d'auteur et soumis aux règles habituelles de bon usage.
L'Université de Liège ne garantit pas la qualité scientifique de ces travaux d'étudiants ni l'exactitude de l'ensemble des informations qu'ils contiennent.