Evaluation of Business Opportunities : A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study of Managers and Entrepreneurs
Geafer, Carmen
Promotor(s) : Ooms, Frédéric
Date of defense : 22-Oct-2024/10-Nov-2024 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/22220
Details
Title : | Evaluation of Business Opportunities : A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study of Managers and Entrepreneurs |
Author : | Geafer, Carmen |
Date of defense : | 22-Oct-2024/10-Nov-2024 |
Advisor(s) : | Ooms, Frédéric |
Committee's member(s) : | Niessen, Wilfried |
Language : | English |
Number of pages : | 75 |
Keywords : | [en] Entrepreneurship, Neuroscience, Neuroentrepreneurship, Eye-Tracking, Signaling Theory |
Discipline(s) : | Business & economic sciences > Multidisciplinary, general & others |
Target public : | Researchers Professionals of domain Student |
Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
Degree: | Master en sciences de gestion, à finalité spécialisée en MBA |
Faculty: | Master thesis of the HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège |
Abstract
[en] This research investigates how managers and entrepreneurs evaluate business opportunities using an eye-tracking approach. We examined the intersection of signaling theory and neuroscience in decision-making, specifically through the evaluation of SWOT analyses. The study contributes to the bourgeoning field of neuroentrepreneurship by highlighting how cognitive processes differ between managers and entrepreneurs during decision-making. It introduces the role of fixation patterns in understanding business opportunity evaluation, offering new perspectives on how entrepreneurs navigate the challenges of undertaking a new venture in dynamic environments.
File(s)
Document(s)
Cite this master thesis
All documents available on MatheO are protected by copyright and subject to the usual rules for fair use.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.