Feedback

Faculté des Sciences
Faculté des Sciences
Mémoire

The impact of carcass feeding on captive wildlife park lions (Panthera leo)

Télécharger
Demoulin, Florence ULiège
Promoteur(s) : Lepoint, Gilles ULiège ; Fernandez, Eduardo
Date de soutenance : 3-sep-2025/5-sep-2025 • URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/23841
Détails
Titre : The impact of carcass feeding on captive wildlife park lions (Panthera leo)
Titre traduit : [fr] Impact d'un régime alimentaire à base de carcasses sur les lions de parc animalier (Panthera leo)
Auteur : Demoulin, Florence ULiège
Date de soutenance  : 3-sep-2025/5-sep-2025
Promoteur(s) : Lepoint, Gilles ULiège
Fernandez, Eduardo 
Membre(s) du jury : Brotcorne, Fany ULiège
Vandenheede, Marc ULiège
Langue : Anglais
Nombre de pages : 48
Discipline(s) : Sciences du vivant > Zoologie
Public cible : Chercheurs
Professionnels du domaine
Etudiants
Grand public
Autre
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Diplôme : Master en biologie des organismes et écologie, à finalité approfondie
Faculté : Mémoires de la Faculté des Sciences

Résumé

[en] Captive lions often experience less ideal environments, including predictable feedings. We tested whether a carcass-based, non-daily feeding regime could elicit more naturalistic activity while maintaining welfare. At Monarto Safari Park (Adelaide, Australia), we monitored two groups: a normal feed group (two females aged 5 and two males aged 3) and an experimental group (three males aged 9). The experimental group was switched from daily processed meat to a 9-day fast-and-feed cycle with 200 kg carcasses, day 1 being the feed day. Using eight cameras, we conducted instantaneous scan sampling every 5 minutes over 24h periods for three months (1 month Baseline, 2 months treatment, 2160h total). We coded five behavior classes and 15 focal behaviors, then compared groups across conditions with two-way ANOVAs and examined Month x Cycle-day effects in the experimental group with linear mixed models.

Groups differed at Baseline, so treatment effects were interpreted primarily within the two groups. Across time, behavior was driven mainly by condition. In the experimental group, activity increased from Baseline to Month 1 and remained above Baseline in Month 2, consistent with carcass manipulation and exploratory locomotion. The normal feed group showed no change. Abnormal behavior increased across conditions in both groups, with pacing in the experimental group rising from 10.9% of scans at Baseline to 21.1% in Month 2. Mixed-model results indicated that locomotion varied by cycle day and was higher in the later days, whereas foraging, lying down and standing showed no significant effect of the month or cycle-day.

Carcass feeding appeared to have successfully stimulated naturalistic activity, but the predictable fasting intervals also amplified pacing. We recommend keeping feeding carcasses while shortening and randomizing the fasting periods, thus balancing natural foraging engagement with stereotypy mitigation. Findings underscore how feeding schedules alone can strongly impact captive lion behavior and should be central to husbandry planning.


Fichier(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Florence_Demoulin_The_Impact_of_Carcass_Feeding_on_Captive_Wildlife_Park_Lions_(Panthera leo).pdf
Description:
Taille: 1.15 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Auteur

  • Demoulin, Florence ULiège Université de Liège > Master biol. orga. & écol., fin. approf.

Promoteur(s)

Membre(s) du jury

  • Brotcorne, Fany ULiège Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Biologie du comportement - Ethologie et psychologie animale
    ORBi Voir ses publications sur ORBi
  • Vandenheede, Marc ULiège Université de Liège - ULiège > Dpt. de gestion vétérinaire des Ressources Animales (DRA) > Ethologie vétérinaire et bien-être des animaux
    ORBi Voir ses publications sur ORBi








Tous les documents disponibles sur MatheO sont protégés par le droit d'auteur et soumis aux règles habituelles de bon usage.
L'Université de Liège ne garantit pas la qualité scientifique de ces travaux d'étudiants ni l'exactitude de l'ensemble des informations qu'ils contiennent.