Feedback

HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
MASTER THESIS

Etude comparative entre néobanques et banques traditionnelles en Europe

Download
Reggers, Jeremy ULiège
Promotor(s) : Hübner, Georges ULiège
Date of defense : 1-Sep-2025/5-Sep-2025 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/24056
Details
Title : Etude comparative entre néobanques et banques traditionnelles en Europe
Translated title : [fr] ÉTUDE DE CAS COMPARATIVE DES MODÈLES ÉCONOMIQUES DES NEOBANQUES: LES TRAJECTOIRES STRATÉGIQUES DE REVOLUT, MONZO ET ORANGE BANK
Author : Reggers, Jeremy ULiège
Date of defense  : 1-Sep-2025/5-Sep-2025
Advisor(s) : Hübner, Georges ULiège
Committee's member(s) : suetens, David 
Language : English
Number of pages : 72
Keywords : [en] Neobanks
[en] Digital banking
[en] Fintech
[en] Business models
[en] Bank strategy
[en] Case study
[en] Europe
[en] Revolut
[en] Monzo
[en] Orange Bank
Discipline(s) : Business & economic sciences > Finance
Business & economic sciences > Strategy & innovation
Target public : Student
General public
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Degree: Master en sciences de gestion, à finalité spécialisée en Banking and Asset Management
Faculty: Master thesis of the HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège

Abstract

[en] This thesis compares the business models and strategic trajectories of three European neobanks
(Revolut, Monzo, and Orange Bank) to explain why some challengers achieve scale and profitability
while others stall. Using a qualitative multiple–case study design supplemented by targeted
quantitative analysis, it draws primarily on banks’ annual reports (2015–2024). The analysis focuses on
five key areas: cost structure, revenue generation, customer acquisition and engagement, product
innovation and regulatory strategy within the context of the EU28.
Findings show three distinct outcomes. Revolut has grown into a diversified ‘super-app’, reaching
profitability in 2021. By 2024, it served over 60 million customers and posted £3.1 billion in revenue
and £790 million in profit, with costs kept to just 56.3% of income. This shows that scale and
profitability are possible when revenues are diversified beyond payments into lending, subscriptions,
trading, and B2B services. Monzo, by contrast, took a more cautious, UK-focused path. After losing over
£500 million between 2017 and 2023, Monzo finally turned a profit in FY2024, earning £15.4 million
on £880 million in revenue. This turnaround was driven by interest income, lending (Flex),
subscriptions, and steady ARPU growth, though efficiency stayed tight with a 97% cost-to-income ratio.
Meanwhile, Orange Bank never reached profitability: in 2023 it brought in €270 million but lost €360.8
million, with costs six times higher than income, which ultimately forced its exit from retail banking.
The analysis points to three success factors: diversifying revenues beyond payments, turning
multibanking users into primary customers, and scaling costs with strong regulatory discipline. Revolut
achieved this through breadth and leverage, Monzo through trust and gradual growth, while Orange
Bank lacked clarity and scale. In the end, a neobank’s durability depends on balancing fast innovation
with solid governance, compliance, and cost control to turn growth into lasting profitability.


File(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Thesis_JeremyReggers_S192254.pdf
Description:
Size: 4.16 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Author

  • Reggers, Jeremy ULiège Université de Liège > Master sc. gest., fin. spéc. banking & asset man.

Promotor(s)

Committee's member(s)

  • suetens, David








All documents available on MatheO are protected by copyright and subject to the usual rules for fair use.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.