Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship
Weis, Félix
Promoteur(s) :
Hillewaert, Koen
Date de soutenance : 8-sep-2025/9-sep-2025 • URL permanente : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/24635
Détails
| Titre : | Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship |
| Titre traduit : | [fr] Modélisation de la turbulence dans une configuration en cascade linéaire d’un compresseur basse pression |
| Auteur : | Weis, Félix
|
| Date de soutenance : | 8-sep-2025/9-sep-2025 |
| Promoteur(s) : | Hillewaert, Koen
|
| Membre(s) du jury : | Terrapon, Vincent
Mahaudens, Simon |
| Langue : | Anglais |
| Nombre de pages : | 130 |
| Mots-clés : | [fr] RANS [fr] turbulence models [fr] low-pressure compressor [fr] compressor cascade [fr] corner separation |
| Discipline(s) : | Ingénierie, informatique & technologie > Ingénierie aérospatiale |
| Organisme(s) subsidiant(s) : | Safran Aero Boosters |
| Public cible : | Chercheurs Professionnels du domaine |
| Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
| Diplôme : | Master en ingénieur civil en aérospatiale, à finalité spécialisée en "aerospace engineering" |
| Faculté : | Mémoires de la Faculté des Sciences appliquées |
Résumé
[en] A wide range of turbulence models were tested following the standard CFD practices of Safran Aero Boosters in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade. The models evaluated include k-ε Launder-Sharma, k-ω, BSL, Spalart-Allmaras, k-l and k-kl models. The effects of a vorticity-based production term, QCR correction, SST correction, rotation correction, a production limiter and the Menter-Langtry transition model were also examined. Two inlet Mach numbers, 0.45 and 0.6, were considered, with incidence angles ranging from 0° to 12°. Only the results for the Mach 0.6 configuration are discussed, as the Mach 0.45 cases led to similar conclusions.
Model incorporating production or viscosity limiters (KW06, Menter-Langtry models, BSL with SST correction and production limiter) predicted thinner upstream endwall boundary layer, stronger cross-flow and larger corner separation structure. These results deviate notably from experimental results. In contrast, two-equation models such as BSL, KL and KKL offered better agreement at low and mid incidences, though none accurately captured high-incidence flow.
Major discrepancies in the leading edge region between models were observed. Foremostly turbulence production in the stagnation region which was found to critically influence midspan losses. A vorticity-based production term reduced these losses but slightly increased corner separation. The SA-QCR model showed promising improvements in capturing separation and loss predictions.
Finally, models using vorticity-based formulations or SST corrections experienced notable convergence issues, limiting their practical applicability.
Fichier(s)
Document(s)
Abstract.pdf
Description:
Taille: 109.17 kB
Format: Adobe PDF
TFE.pdf
Description:
Taille: 24.96 MB
Format: Adobe PDF
Citer ce mémoire
L'Université de Liège ne garantit pas la qualité scientifique de ces travaux d'étudiants ni l'exactitude de l'ensemble des informations qu'ils contiennent.

Master Thesis Online

