Feedback

HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège
MASTER THESIS
VIEW 79 | DOWNLOAD 1

Defining the best fundamental indexing strategy from 1998 to 2015.

Download
Colmonts, Maxime ULiège
Promotor(s) : Lambert, Marie ULiège
Date of defense : 6-Sep-2016/12-Sep-2016 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/1860
Details
Title : Defining the best fundamental indexing strategy from 1998 to 2015.
Translated title : [fr] Definir la meilleur stratégie d'indexation fondamentale de 1998 à 2015
Author : Colmonts, Maxime ULiège
Date of defense  : 6-Sep-2016/12-Sep-2016
Advisor(s) : Lambert, Marie ULiège
Committee's member(s) : Fays, Boris ULiège
Cogneau, Philippe ULiège
Language : English
Number of pages : 106
Keywords : [en] smart beta
[en] fundamental indexing
[en] profit metrics
[en] dividend metrics
[en] outperformance
Discipline(s) : Business & economic sciences > Finance
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Degree: Master en sciences de gestion, à finalité spécialisée en Banking and Asset Management
Faculty: Master thesis of the HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège

Abstract

[en] In this paper, we try to establish the best -smart beta- fundamental metric among the dividend metric and the profit metric. Regarding the dividend metrics, we built a pure dividend, a dividend yield and net payout indexes. For profit metrics, we decided to focus on the gross profitability, the operating profitability and the cash operating return on assets metrics. The covered period runs from the 1st of January 1998 to the 1st of January 2015 and covers two expansion and two recession cycles. We used the Nasqad composite of March 2016 as a basket of stocks in order to construct our indexes. In our quest to find the best metric among those we chose, we decided to apply different weighting and sorting methodology to our indexes. The weighting strategy we tested are respectively the fundamentally weighted method and the equally weighted method. Regarding the sorting of data, we decided to apply to them the last data available method and trailing five-year average method. The latter is assumed to smooth the data in order to reduce the high cyclical performance (Arnott, Hsu and Moore, 2005). At the end of the day, we ended up with four different indexes for each studied metric.
Then, we have computed some of the most important performance ratios for each index that we built and we plotted their cumulative monthly returns. These results helped us to compare the indexes regarding their risk-adjusted returns and to establish the indexes with the best potential.
Afterwards, we regressed each of our indexes on the Fama & French 4-factor to which we also added the VIX. At the end of the day, we analyze whether our indexes were tilted towards market, size, value, winner and implied volatility factor.
Ultimately, we conclude that the trailing five-year average operating profitability index, that is equally weighted, outperforms the other dividend metrics as well as the other profit metrics.


File(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Définitif_mémoire_pdf.pdf
Description:
Size: 2.25 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Author

  • Colmonts, Maxime ULiège Université de Liège > Master sc. gest., fin. spéc. banking & asset (ex 2e master)

Promotor(s)

Committee's member(s)

  • Fays, Boris ULiège Université de Liège - ULg > HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'ULg : UER > Analyse financière et finance d'entreprise
    ORBi View his publications on ORBi
  • Cogneau, Philippe ULiège Université de Liège - ULg > HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'ULg : UER > Gestion financière
    ORBi View his publications on ORBi
  • Total number of views 79
  • Total number of downloads 1










All documents available on MatheO are protected by copyright and subject to the usual rules for fair use.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.