Does the real economy still forecast technology stock returns in the United States listed companies? Evidence in an age of digital economy and crises
Paschal, Alexi
Promotor(s) : Hambuckers, Julien
Date of defense : 18-Jun-2024/25-Jun-2024 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/19857
Details
Title : | Does the real economy still forecast technology stock returns in the United States listed companies? Evidence in an age of digital economy and crises |
Translated title : | [fr] L'économie réelle permet-elle encore de prévoir les rendements des actions technologiques dans les sociétés cotées aux États-Unis ? Preuves à l'ère de l'économie numérique et des crises. |
Author : | Paschal, Alexi |
Date of defense : | 18-Jun-2024/25-Jun-2024 |
Advisor(s) : | Hambuckers, Julien |
Committee's member(s) : | Crucil, Romain |
Language : | English |
Number of pages : | 106 |
Keywords : | [en] equity premium [en] real economy [en] technology sector |
Discipline(s) : | Business & economic sciences > Finance |
Target public : | Researchers Professionals of domain |
Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
Degree: | Master en ingénieur de gestion, à finalité spécialisée en Financial Engineering |
Faculty: | Master thesis of the HEC-Ecole de gestion de l'Université de Liège |
Abstract
[en] This thesis investigates whether the real economy continues to provide predictive signals for
technology stock returns in U.S. companies during the digital era and economic crises. The study
updates and extends previous research by focusing on modern economic indicators and their
forecasting power amidst the evolving market landscape influenced by technological advancements
and recent economic disruptions.
The research explores the viability of historical economic indicators in forecasting stock returns,
particularly in the U.S. technology sector. It questions whether these indicators, which proved useful
in past decades, still hold predictive power in a radically transformed economic and technological
environment.
The thesis adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analyses with econometric
modelling. The data spans several decades, focusing on periods marked by significant economic events,
such as the dot-com bubble, the 2008 financial crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic, to assess the
robustness of forecasting models under different economic conditions.
The study replicates and extends previous methodologies using RStudio, allowing for a comparison
between past and current forecasting abilities of various economic indicators under different
economic conditions. Leveraging Google Colab and Python, the thesis incorporates machine learning
techniques to examine the predictive power of traditional and newly proposed economic indicators.
This analysis aims to uncover complex nonlinear relationships that might be missed by conventional
econometric models.
The findings suggest that the traditional indicators have diminished in predictive power. The discussion
delves into the implications of the findings for investors and policymakers, emphasising the need for
adaptive strategies that account for the rapid technological changes and their impact on the economic
landscape. The thesis concludes that the real economy continues to provide valuable insights into
technology stock returns, even if the predictive power has diminished. It calls for ongoing research to
refine these indicators and adapt forecasting models to the changing economic and technological
environment.
Suggestions for future research include exploring additional digital economy indicators and extending
the analysis to global technology markets to validate the findings and enhance the generalizability of
the forecasting models. This study contributes to the literature by updating forecasting models with
contemporary economic indicators and by demonstrating the evolving relationship between the real
economy and technology stock returns in the face of digital transformation and economic crises.
File(s)
Document(s)
Annexe(s)
Cite this master thesis
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.