Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian and Fluid-Structure Interaction formulations to simulate bird impacts[BR]- Integration internship
Quettier, Nathan
Promotor(s) :
Ponthot, Jean-Philippe
Date of defense : 30-Jun-2025/1-Jul-2025 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/23348
Details
| Title : | Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian and Fluid-Structure Interaction formulations to simulate bird impacts[BR]- Integration internship |
| Translated title : | [fr] Formulations Lagrangienne-Eulérienne Arbitraire et Interaction Fluide-Structure pour la simulation d’impacts d’oiseaux |
| Author : | Quettier, Nathan
|
| Date of defense : | 30-Jun-2025/1-Jul-2025 |
| Advisor(s) : | Ponthot, Jean-Philippe
|
| Committee's member(s) : | Boman, Romain
Toussaint, Brieuc |
| Language : | English |
| Number of pages : | 207 |
| Keywords : | [en] Abritrary Lagrangian-Eulerian [en] ALE [en] Fluid-Structure Interaction [en] Impact Simulation [en] Ls-Dyna [en] FSI |
| Discipline(s) : | Engineering, computing & technology > Aerospace & aeronautics engineering |
| Target public : | Researchers Professionals of domain Student |
| Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
| Degree: | Master en ingénieur civil en aérospatiale, à finalité spécialisée en "aerospace engineering" |
| Faculty: | Master thesis of the Faculté des Sciences appliquées |
Abstract
[en] This thesis investigates the theoretical foundations, implementation details, and performance of the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) and Fluid-Structure Interaction
(FSI) formulations in LS-DYNA, and compares them to the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method. A two-part approach was adopted.
First, a simple case study consisting of a plane-strain bar impact on a rigid wall was considered. The different ALE formulations in LS-DYNA were introduced, and their results
were compared to those of the Lagrangian formulation. Generally more computationally
expensive, they yielded comparable outcomes—sometimes of slightly lower accuracy—
with their mesh quality remaining acceptable despite large strains. The FSI formulation
was then introduced to model contact interactions between bodies and was compared
to conventional Lagrangian contact. Also more computationally expensive, it produced
similar results to the Lagrangian case, aside from slightly larger energy losses.
This initial study of the ALE and FSI behaviors revealed the influence of various parameters and highlighted the strengths and limitations of each formulation.
Second, a large-scale model—originally developed for SPH simulations—was used to evaluate the performance of the ALE and FSI formulations in terms of computational cost
and result fidelity compared to experimental data. While the ALE and FSI formulations
produced results similar to the SPH simulation, mesh-convergence issues limited the reliability of the comparison. The source of these issues could not be clearly identified,
partly due to the inherited complexity and uncertainties of the provided model. Despite
these challenges, the study demonstrated the potential of ALE and FSI formulations to
compete with SPH, especially when extended features such as mesh motion are utilized
to mitigate computational costs.
File(s)
Document(s)
MasterThesis.pdf
Description:
Size: 68.84 MB
Format: Adobe PDF
Cite this master thesis
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.

Master Thesis Online


ThesisSummary.pdf