Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship
Weis, Félix
Promotor(s) :
Hillewaert, Koen
Date of defense : 8-Sep-2025/9-Sep-2025 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/24635
Details
| Title : | Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship |
| Translated title : | [fr] Modélisation de la turbulence dans une configuration en cascade linéaire d’un compresseur basse pression |
| Author : | Weis, Félix
|
| Date of defense : | 8-Sep-2025/9-Sep-2025 |
| Advisor(s) : | Hillewaert, Koen
|
| Committee's member(s) : | Terrapon, Vincent
Mahaudens, Simon |
| Language : | English |
| Number of pages : | 130 |
| Keywords : | [fr] RANS [fr] turbulence models [fr] low-pressure compressor [fr] compressor cascade [fr] corner separation |
| Discipline(s) : | Engineering, computing & technology > Aerospace & aeronautics engineering |
| Funders : | Safran Aero Boosters |
| Target public : | Researchers Professionals of domain |
| Institution(s) : | Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique |
| Degree: | Master en ingénieur civil en aérospatiale, à finalité spécialisée en "aerospace engineering" |
| Faculty: | Master thesis of the Faculté des Sciences appliquées |
Abstract
[en] A wide range of turbulence models were tested following the standard CFD practices of Safran Aero Boosters in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade. The models evaluated include k-ε Launder-Sharma, k-ω, BSL, Spalart-Allmaras, k-l and k-kl models. The effects of a vorticity-based production term, QCR correction, SST correction, rotation correction, a production limiter and the Menter-Langtry transition model were also examined. Two inlet Mach numbers, 0.45 and 0.6, were considered, with incidence angles ranging from 0° to 12°. Only the results for the Mach 0.6 configuration are discussed, as the Mach 0.45 cases led to similar conclusions.
Model incorporating production or viscosity limiters (KW06, Menter-Langtry models, BSL with SST correction and production limiter) predicted thinner upstream endwall boundary layer, stronger cross-flow and larger corner separation structure. These results deviate notably from experimental results. In contrast, two-equation models such as BSL, KL and KKL offered better agreement at low and mid incidences, though none accurately captured high-incidence flow.
Major discrepancies in the leading edge region between models were observed. Foremostly turbulence production in the stagnation region which was found to critically influence midspan losses. A vorticity-based production term reduced these losses but slightly increased corner separation. The SA-QCR model showed promising improvements in capturing separation and loss predictions.
Finally, models using vorticity-based formulations or SST corrections experienced notable convergence issues, limiting their practical applicability.
File(s)
Document(s)
Abstract.pdf
Description:
Size: 109.17 kB
Format: Adobe PDF
TFE.pdf
Description:
Size: 24.96 MB
Format: Adobe PDF
Cite this master thesis
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.

Master Thesis Online

