Feedback

Faculté des Sciences appliquées
Faculté des Sciences appliquées
MASTER THESIS

Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship

Download
Weis, Félix ULiège
Promotor(s) : Hillewaert, Koen ULiège
Date of defense : 8-Sep-2025/9-Sep-2025 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/24635
Details
Title : Master thesis and internship[BR]- Master's thesis : Turbulence modeling in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade configuration[BR]- Integration internship
Translated title : [fr] Modélisation de la turbulence dans une configuration en cascade linéaire d’un compresseur basse pression
Author : Weis, Félix ULiège
Date of defense  : 8-Sep-2025/9-Sep-2025
Advisor(s) : Hillewaert, Koen ULiège
Committee's member(s) : Terrapon, Vincent ULiège
Mahaudens, Simon 
Language : English
Number of pages : 130
Keywords : [fr] RANS
[fr] turbulence models
[fr] low-pressure compressor
[fr] compressor cascade
[fr] corner separation
Discipline(s) : Engineering, computing & technology > Aerospace & aeronautics engineering
Funders : Safran Aero Boosters
Target public : Researchers
Professionals of domain
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Degree: Master en ingénieur civil en aérospatiale, à finalité spécialisée en "aerospace engineering"
Faculty: Master thesis of the Faculté des Sciences appliquées

Abstract

[en] A wide range of turbulence models were tested following the standard CFD practices of Safran Aero Boosters in a linear low-pressure compressor cascade. The models evaluated include k-ε Launder-Sharma, k-ω, BSL, Spalart-Allmaras, k-l and k-kl models. The effects of a vorticity-based production term, QCR correction, SST correction, rotation correction, a production limiter and the Menter-Langtry transition model were also examined. Two inlet Mach numbers, 0.45 and 0.6, were considered, with incidence angles ranging from 0° to 12°. Only the results for the Mach 0.6 configuration are discussed, as the Mach 0.45 cases led to similar conclusions.
Model incorporating production or viscosity limiters (KW06, Menter-Langtry models, BSL with SST correction and production limiter) predicted thinner upstream endwall boundary layer, stronger cross-flow and larger corner separation structure. These results deviate notably from experimental results. In contrast, two-equation models such as BSL, KL and KKL offered better agreement at low and mid incidences, though none accurately captured high-incidence flow.
Major discrepancies in the leading edge region between models were observed. Foremostly turbulence production in the stagnation region which was found to critically influence midspan losses. A vorticity-based production term reduced these losses but slightly increased corner separation. The SA-QCR model showed promising improvements in capturing separation and loss predictions.
Finally, models using vorticity-based formulations or SST corrections experienced notable convergence issues, limiting their practical applicability.


File(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Abstract.pdf
Description:
Size: 109.17 kB
Format: Adobe PDF
File
Access TFE.pdf
Description:
Size: 24.96 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Author

  • Weis, Félix ULiège Université de Liège > Master ing. civ. aéro., fin. spéc. aer. eng.

Promotor(s)

Committee's member(s)

  • Terrapon, Vincent ULiège Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Modélisation et contrôle des écoulements turbulents
    ORBi View his publications on ORBi
  • Mahaudens, Simon








All documents available on MatheO are protected by copyright and subject to the usual rules for fair use.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.