Feedback

Faculté des Sciences
Faculté des Sciences
MASTER THESIS
VIEW 123 | DOWNLOAD 713

Simulation-based comparative performance of survival methods in the case of non-proportional hazards

Download
Thunus, Emeline ULiège
Promotor(s) : Donneau, Anne-Françoise ULiège
Date of defense : 10-Sep-2018 • Permalink : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/5537
Details
Title : Simulation-based comparative performance of survival methods in the case of non-proportional hazards
Author : Thunus, Emeline ULiège
Date of defense  : 10-Sep-2018
Advisor(s) : Donneau, Anne-Françoise ULiège
Committee's member(s) : Timmermans, Catherine ULiège
Mathonet, Pierre ULiège
Mauer, Murielle 
Kivinski, Michal 
Language : English
Number of pages : 82
Keywords : [en] Survival analysis
[en] non-proportional hazards
[en] comparison of surival methods
[en] logrank
[en] restricted mean survival time
[en] generalised pairwise comparison
[en] weighted logrank
[en] weighted Kaplan-Meier
[en] immunotherapy
Discipline(s) : Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences > Mathematics
Institution(s) : Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique
Degree: Master en sciences mathématiques, à finalité spécialisée en statistique
Faculty: Master thesis of the Faculté des Sciences

Abstract

[en] A popular choice in cancer research when comparing survival between treatments is to consider the log-rank test. It has been well-established that it is the most powerful non-parametric test to compare survival functions when the hazards are proportional over time. However, in the case of non-proportional hazards, the log-rank test may no longer be optimal. While a number of statistical approaches have been invertigated to compare treatment effects on survival when the hazards are not proportional, they are still underused. This lack of application can be explained by the fact that it is currently unclear which approach should be used to design and analyze studies comparing cancer treatments. In this study, a particular focus is on immunotherapy treatments. The issue of how to compare treatment effects when the hazards are likely non-proportional is of major interest for contemporary cancer research due to the groundbreaking achievements of immunotherapy, which is typically characterized by a delayed treatment effect. The aim of this present master thesis was to compare the classical logrank test and methods designed to deal with non-proportional hazards. We reviewed the statistical properties of different approaches to deal with non-proportional hazards including the logrank test, methods based on the restricted mean survival time, generalized pairwise comparison, weighted log-rank and weighted Kaplan-Meier tests. We also performed an extensive simulation study to investigate their size under various scenarios. Finally, all methods are illustrated on the real EORTC 18991 trial outcome data.


File(s)

Document(s)

File
Access Memoire_Thunus_Emeline.pdf
Description:
Size: 1.47 MB
Format: Adobe PDF

Author

  • Thunus, Emeline ULiège Université de Liège > Master sc. math., à fin.

Promotor(s)

Committee's member(s)

  • Timmermans, Catherine ULiège Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de mathématique > Statistique
    ORBi View his publications on ORBi
  • Mathonet, Pierre ULiège Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de mathématique > Géométrie différentielle
    ORBi View his publications on ORBi
  • Mauer, Murielle EORTC > entreprise
  • Kivinski, Michal EORTC > entreprise
  • Total number of views 123
  • Total number of downloads 713










All documents available on MatheO are protected by copyright and subject to the usual rules for fair use.
The University of Liège does not guarantee the scientific quality of these students' works or the accuracy of all the information they contain.